Clear U.S. owner review and site inspection the first time

The problem

Most U.S. project delays for imported equipment are not about the equipment — they are about paper: a datasheet written to the wrong code edition, a motor or panel that does not meet NEC requirements, a relief device sized to a standard the owner's reviewer does not accept. Each gap costs a round of technical queries (TQs) and weeks of schedule.

What we do

We review your equipment against the codes and standards the U.S. project actually invokes, close the gaps before submittal, and support you through the owner's technical clarification process.

• ASME and API compliance. Pressure equipment to ASME Section VIII, piping to ASME B31.3, valves to API 600 / 6D / 598, relief devices to API 520 / 521 / 526 — reviewed against the project specification, not just the catalogue.
• Technical clarification (TQ) support. We draft and defend your TQ responses in the reviewer's language, so answers land the first time.
• UL 508A control panels. Panel design review and UL 508A shop coordination, so the panel ships with the listing the site inspector expects.
• NRTL field evaluation. When equipment arrives without a recognized listing, we coordinate field evaluation by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory.
• NEC compliance. Electrical scope checked against the National Electrical Code: area classification, wiring methods, and nameplate data.

What you get

A gap list before you submit, corrected documents that match the project specification, and TQ responses that shorten the review cycle instead of extending it.

When you need it

An owner or EPC has returned your submittal with code comments; a project specification cites standards your team has not worked to; or you are quoting a U.S. project for the first time and want the bid to be technically clean.

Book a 20-minute discovery call

← Back to home